On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:01:15 -0800, "John Kunkel"
wrote:


"Gunner" wrote in message
.. .

Indeed. The Leftwing nut cases need to ask themselves a simple
question...why didnt Bush simply put a few hundred WMDs belonging to
the US (we still have large stockpiles) into a few warehouses in Iraq,
and use it as the "proof" Saddam had WMDs.

It would have shut down the Left like flipping off a main breaker.

Now lets hear a Anti-Bu****e give us the reasons why he didnt.
Double dog dare them.

Dare taken. Simple answer... too many loose lips. The ruse would have been
made public in no time just as the false assertions that lead to war
eventually were.

OTOH, if the underground (river) nuclear facilities were indeed real as
your OP suggests, the Neocon talking heads would be citing it as proof that
their original allegations were true. You and the other Bushinistas need to
ask yourself why they haven't. Lack of such rhetoric suggests they know the
story is lame.


(Frankly I dont think any Leftwinger is smart enough to come up with
the answer(s)..besides, it would cause them to implode when they had
to examine their own world view)

In an earlier post you whined that some responders to your OP were "killing
the messenger" when in reality you are the poster boy for ad hominem
responses, everyone who disagrees with you or the Neocons is automatically
labeled a Liberal, Lib-tard, leftie, ad nauseum. If you can dish it out, be
prepared to take it.


Yet you are prepared to claim that Bush conspired to start the Iraq
war for bogus reasons, and managed to keep everyone blinded since the
war started.

Along with an entire Libtard mantra of other things that yall blame
on Bush.

As I stated, and you confirmed...no leftwinger is smart enough to come
up with.....

Gunner