On Nov 23, 9:16 am, Wes wrote:
Gerry wrote:
On Nov 23, 7:35 am, Joseph Gwinn wrote:
The author, Mike Cox, is the attorney general of Michigan.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010898

The Wall Street Journal, Friday, November 23, 2007.

Joe Gwinn

Or the chance to totally screw it up with a fu'd decision like they
did with emminant domain a year ago.

Affirming your property isn't yours if someone else wants it to put
something on it that generates higher taxes which is considered a public
good.

It would seem natural to snuf out gun rights in case someone gets some silly
idea of standing his ground on his ground.

Wes

I believe you are correct.

I see far too much "they are going to vote for me" from the gun
owners...it could EASILY go the other way.

Ready to hand over your guns?

You know...all those guns that are registered so the Feds know that
you have them.

If not....well I guess that makes you a terrorist under the Republican
Patriot Act.

No one thought that the emminant domain issue would go the way it
did...you have no right to own property if any government...local,
state or federal decides otherwise.

TMT

TMT