w_tom wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:25 am, bud-- wrote:
Why should anyone believe you?

A plug-in protector promoter

Ho-hum. The “old political trick” repetition #29.

only had to provide manufacturer spec
numbers that list each type of surge

Lacking valid technical arguments poor w_ has to invent issues. Plug-in
suppressors have MOVs from H-G, N-G, H-N. That covers all surge modes.

w_’s favored SquareD service panel suppressors do not list “each type of
surge”.


A protector is only as effective as its earth ground

The required statement of religious belief in earthing.

But still no link to another lunatic that says plug-in suppressors are
NOT effective.

And still no answers to really simple questions:
- Why do the only 2 examples of protection in the IEEE guide use plug-in
suppressors?
- Why does the NIST guide says plug-in suppressors are "the easiest
solution"?
- How would a service panel suppressor provide any protection in the
IEEE example, pdf page 42?
- Why did Martzloff say in his paper "One solution. illustrated in this
paper, is the insertion of a properly designed [multiport plug-in surge
suppressor]."
- Why does the IEEE Emerald book include plug-in suppressors as an
effective surge protection device.
- Why don't favored SquareD service panel suppressors list "each type of
surge"?
- Where is the link to a 75,000A 1475Joule rated MOV for $0.10.
- What are w_'s connections to surge protection equipment
manufacturers? Specifically ZeroSurge?
- Why don’t favored SquareD service panel suppressors list “each type of
surge”?


Bizarre claim - plug-in surge suppressors don't work
Never any sources that say plug-in suppressors are NOT effective.
Twists opposing sources to say the opposite of what they really say.
Invents opinions and attributes them to opponents.
Attempts to discredit opponents.
w_ is still a purveyor of junk science.

--
bud--