Gunner wrote in message . ..
On Sat, 22 May 2004 18:48:48 GMT, Carl Nisarel
wrote:

Getting his ass kicked yet again, Mark the Moron Gunner
wrote:

On Sat, 22 May 2004 16:05:30 GMT, Carl Nisarel

Attempting Eddaic Poetry for the first time, Gunner wrote:

One should also understand that Arthur Kellerman MD did
the Study at the request of the once AntiGun CDC etc.
IRRC it was first published in JAMA.

Once again Mark goes for the idiotic genetic fallacy.

"Kellerman's study was completely disingenuous,

Yet another genetic fallacy.

I'll let zuckier kick your ass on the Kellermann research.

Sounds like fun to me. God save me, my worst vice is deflating pompous
ignorant windbags.

You're not even smart enough to spell his name correctly.

Thats pretty sad Cattle..when you are so low on ammo you have to
resort to spelling flames..snicker

It's not a spelling flame when you can't even spell the name of the
person you are discussing. How exactly do you search for 'Kellerman',
and get anything other than the hermetically sealed little world of
crackpots, gunloons, and Usenet cranks which keeps repeating the same
nonsense and passing it around and then trotting it out as though they
had actually taken the time to read the original paper and ponder it
deeply. Take your post here as a case in point. On the other hand, if
you actually search for 'Kellermann', you may at least find some
intelligent commentary from the world of the sane. For someone who
squeals 'Cites! Cites' as much as you, you sure don't have much
interest in actually making use of the information the net provides to
those who make an effort. I look forward to your discussions of what
you've learned about Shakespear, Einstien, and Platoh.



.....

Unlike Kellerman, Kleck's award-winning study has been
peer-reviewed"

Kellermann's studies were peer-reviewed.

Really? By whom..Sarah Brady? Cites boy..cites!

There it is again, 'cites! Cites!'. Perhaps you could explain to us
all exactly what 'Cites' have to do with peer review. Peer review is a
specific term with a specific meaning that has been unchanged for
decades, maybe even centuries, and 'Cites' are not involved. You
apparently don't know the difference between peer review and a book
review.
For your information, NEJM is perhaps the most aggressively peer
reviewed journal in the world. No paper gets published there without
peer review. That's why when someone like Kellermann publishes there,
the little diddly arguments you guys use against this 'Kellerman'
character don't wash. The paper has already been scrutinized by people
more intelligent and educated than you will ever be.

Why are you posting false statements, Mark?

Why are you lying to deflect, Cattle?

Gunner


That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's
cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays
there.
- George Orwell