View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
Bruce in Bangkok Bruce in Bangkok is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Gasoline transport truck wrecks, burns under bridge...melts iron beams. Now why can't...?

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:09:27 -0700, rigger wrote:

On Nov 1, 7:34 pm, Bruce in Bangkok wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:17:01 -0000, Igor wrote:
On Nov 1, 3:37 pm, GatherNoMoss wrote:
......Why couldn't a large jet passenger plane, full of fuel, that
crashes into the World Trade Center building not have enough heat
energy to soften it metal structure enough to cause it's collapse ?


I ask the 9/11 conspiracy theorists this question....those who think
it impossible that it could happen.


Maybe you're just asking the wrong question. Maybe you should be
asking why Bush knew it was going to happen and did absolutely nothing
to stop it.


I don't live in the U.S. and aren't exposed to the US news, to any
great extent, so what I know about this conspiracy theory of why the
WTC fell down is from reading newsgroups like this one.

The point I don't understand is if the WTC was a conspiracy, why did
the conspiracy take place? Money? Power? Politics?

The whole conspiracy theory is a mystery to me.

Bruce-in-Bangkok
(Note:displayed e-mail
address is a spam trap)


The point I don't understand is if the WTC was a conspiracy, why

did
the conspiracy take place? Money? Power? Politics?


During the Vietnam conflict the "false flag" incident which
caused things to heat-up was the Gulf of Tonkin incident
where a false attack was attributed to the enemy thereby
creating a threat in the mind of the American public which
gave the U.S. the "public" reason it needed to escalate
the conflict.

It wasn't that long ago that one of our war ships was attacked
by Israeli war planes. During this attack neither the planes
or our back-up ships in the area would acknowledge radio
traffic by the U.S. ship. After much damage and casualties
the attack finally stopped. No good excuse has been
offered in this incident. My personal belief is that individual
Israeli officers took it on themselves to break-off (don't ask
for cites).

How difficult do you believe it would be to slip a group
of Israeli commandos into the U.S. and arm them with
the tools needed for another "false flag" incident? How
about giving the Israeli government a cruise missile or two?
This could certainly explain the hole in the wall of the
Pentagon. This could also explain why no one in the U.S.
has come forward with information.

dennis
in nca


This is just what I was talking about.

Logic would lead one to doubt that Israel had anything to do with the
WTC as the U.S. provides the major support, both financially and
politically for Israel.

As far as I can see the Israelis are pragmatic, "if it is to our
benefit do it!" On the other hand no one has ever accused Israelis of
being stupid.

Regardless of what power you may attribute to the "Jewish Block" in
the U.S. I cannot believe that any politician would not have voted for
an immediate declaration of war against Israel had it ever been
discovered that they were responsible for the WTC disaster. To fail to
do so would mean the abrupt end to the politician's career.

If one accepts this premise then it should be obvious that it was not
be to Israel's advantage to blow up the WTC as the downside would be
an immediate loss of U.S. support, or worse.

As for the Israeli attack on the U.S. ship I think it likely that it
was an incident similar to the U.S. shooting down the civilian
airliner over the Red Sea. I see you coming my way, I call you on the
radio, you don't answer, BANG!


Bruce-in-Bangkok
(Note:displayed e-mail
address is a spam trap)