On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:44:03 GMT, TheTruth
wrote:

Why Do We Not Wish for a Judaized World?

The answer is EASY!!!

Do you want the WHOLE WORLD to be as ****ed up as the middle-east has been for
the last 3000 years? You can take all the unnatural religions (not based on
nature) from those civilizations and cram them up your unnatural good vs. evil
asses.



That reminds me of the "Nature's God" referred to in the Declaration
of Independence. It's not Judaic, not Islamic, and certainly not
Christian.




On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:18:02 GMT, "Toller" wrote:


"Ted" wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 29, 10:42 am, valj wrote:
October 26, 2007

What Is At Stake Is Beauty

By Patrick Grimm

What is at stake is beauty. Why do we not wish for a Judaized world?
Simple. Because it is a world devoid of beauty, yet rife with
soulless consumerism and slave workers grinding away on a global
plantation, an international gulag run by our moneyed masters. A
Judaized world is a world swept clean of higher life, for higher life
cannot exist where the dollar is god, where the man with the most
shekels is king.

What is at stake is beauty. Yet in a Judaized mindset, womanhood and
true feminine qualities like empathy, nurturance and childbirth are
devalued, destroyed, made of no effect. No, laboring for the Almighty
Dollar is the lord of all, even if it means blotting out family,
faith and offspring. Traditional families are mocked and twisted
"alternative lifestyles" are portrayed as the paragon of health, the
camera lights blotting out the maggot within the apple.

What is at stake is beauty. A Jewish intelligentsia and culture is
one where filth, depravity, degeneracy and socialism are celebrated.
It is the difference between Dostoevsky and a pulp comic. It is the
giant leap backward into a Lord of the Flies milieu, a Jew brainchild
where aesthetically pleasing art is quashed and urination, defecation
and mockery of God, country and flag reign supreme. It is JEWISHNESS
put to the canvas and the page.

What is at stake is beauty. The beauty of our philosophers, of our
Golden Rule, our sages, our great authors, poets and musicians,
painters and sculptors has been replaced with perversions that defy
belief. It means that ugliness is now vogue, the outre is kitschy and
slickly chic for those who make it their aim to flaunt what is
snidely called "conventional." The Jewish hate for the comely has
caused a broadside of disdain and the deconstructing of standards
across the board. We are only seeing the opening act of their very
long-running "stage play" of disease and disorder pirouetting its way
across our universe, infecting all it touches.

What is at stake is beauty. The Jewish psychopaths and sociopaths who
have seized control of us will never be satisfied till they have
soiled and debauched, collapsed and caved in all we have built. They
will do it with their insatiable bloodlust, their megalomaniacal
wars, their endorsement and parading of every kind of sickness in the
human soul and spirit. There is no malignancy they will choose not to
approve of, no subversive movement they won't lead and no radical,
harmful cause that they will pass on funding and fighting for. They
will steal our money, smash our treasures, sell our guarded secrets
and make a lie of all our truths. They will gut and turn our
religions to their purposes, enlist our very children to bleed for
their propaganda, drug our boys till they are feminine and docile and
easy to shape. They have made the lovely female body into nothing
more than cheap pornography and told us to hate our very history,
roots and race. No one has harmed us so much and loved us so little.
No one is less deserving of our forgiveness and no one is more
arrogant and less likely to ask for it, though the mountain of crimes
against us rivals ancient Babel.

What is at stake is beauty and yes, it has been said before, only
beauty can save us.

http://zionis****ch.wordpress.com/

The writer is a bit intense but asks tough questions about troubling
aspects of our society.

"Intense"?! Is that the a new word for absurd?