View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Cicero Cicero is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,226
Default Tadpole CH deaerator - marketing gimmick?

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:50:07 +0000, Andy Hall wrote:

On 2007-10-30 09:17:14 +0000, Cicero said:

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:07:52 +0000, mwindsor wrote:

Has anyone any experience of these, or know how they might differ from
traditional air separators, or the spirovent air separators that BES
stock?

The tadpole is £195, which seems excessive!

http://www.tagonatadpole.com/

Cheers,
M.

==================================
The Press page on the 'Tadpole' site states that it was patented by the
inventor, Stan Whetsone of Barlby North Yorkshire. It seems unlikely
that a patent would be granted for what appears to be little more than a
basic air separator unless the makers of those already in use failed to
patent their idea. Genuine independent and controlled tests rather than
anecdotal 'case studies' would be more convincing.

Cic.


Like those tests that the electromagnetic water conditioner suppliers
publish? They *look* scientific and controlled.

It also rather depends on *what* was patented.


==================================
I said, "*Genuine* *independent* and *controlled* tests.......". Given
those three provisos it should be possible to arrive at a genuine result
to establish the truth about the inventor's claims one way or another.

Cic.

--
===================================
Using Ubuntu Linux
Windows shown the door
===================================