On 27 Oct 2007 02:44:29 GMT, Jim Yanik wrote:

George W wrote in
:

On 25 Oct 2007 16:52:44 GMT, Jim Yanik wrote:
[snip]

well,for liberals,

Note that "liberal" and "conservative" are BOTH desirable qualities in
limited amounts. Unconditionally favoring one over the other makes no
sense. The use of such labels are necessarily incorrect (there are no
absolutes) and effectively limit people's thoughts and actions.

I use the term "liberal" as it is generaly meant in current usage.
Meaning "leftist/socialist/'progressive'/Communist".
I agree that many current "conservatives" are not always conservative.
I myself am not 100 % "Conservative".
But I DO believe that written law should mean the same as written *always*.
Otherwise,it's meaningless.

I reserve the right to not continue a discussion with someone who
consistently replies to things I didn't say while ignoring those I
did.

[snip]
--
59 days until the winter solstice celebration

Mark Lloyd
http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com

"Unlike biological evolution. 'intelligent design' is
not a genuine scientific theory and, therefore, has
no place in the curriculum of our nation's public
school classes." -- Ted Kennedy