DIYbanter - View Single Post

Jim Yanik

(Doug Miller) wrote in
t:

In article , Mark Lloyd
wrote:
At one time whisky was illegal.

How can you say that? According to you, the term "illegal" has no
meaning. It's just an "artificial construct."

Did that make whisky any different?

Nobody ever contended that it did.

If
there's something wrought about whisky, it's wrong regardless of what
the law says. Notice how whisky was not changed, just the law.

And your point is -- ?

The law changed. So what? Get over it. Laws change. That does *not*
alter the fact that they exist, or that certain behaviors comply with
them and other behaviors don't.

People who think like this "Mark Lloyd" are what's wrong with the world.

IMO,you're arguing with a void.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net