"Anthony Matonak" wrote in message
...
Eeyore wrote:
John Stumbles wrote:
Eeyore wrote:

Unless there is a perceived need to reprocess nuclear fuel, keeping it
out of the biosphere is absurdly simple. You just 'contain' it in a
safe
place !
What's absurdly simple about devising 'containment' for radioactively
and
thermally hot chemicals, that must remain hermetically sealed for the
order
of millions of years?

They don't need to be *hermetically* sealed. Just kept in a cool dry
environment. We fret excessively over used reactor rods.

I suppose there are places, like Russia, that have large areas already
contaminated with lots of radioactive material. One method to deal with
nuclear waste would be to ship it there and just dump it on the ground.
Maybe put up a warning sign.

This is still off topic for all of these newsgroups.

Anthony
Yes and no,since the nuts and bolts of solar energy and wind is the nuke
energy from the sun.
Which would make nuke alternate energy......give or take the bean counters
realizing that.
And this is an alternative energy group.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----