View Single Post
  #29   Report Post  
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
Robert Weldon Robert Weldon is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...


wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:06:05 GMT, "Robert Weldon"
wrote:


"Dallas D" wrote in message
news:4k6Pi.11958$%B2.9471@edtnps82...
Ok I watched Terror Storm and Loose Change 2 and I am convinced it was
an
inside job. The most confusing thing is why there are no videos of the
"plane" crashing into the pentagon? You'd think they would have security
cameras on every corner of that place. Why didn't they release the tape
is
beyond me and is what has me convinced they are hiding something.


Well then you are an idiot. Why the hell would they have security cameras
pointing at the sky? They are aimed at potential security risk points,
which approach along the ground, so are pointed at things like doorways,
roads, etc., there was no reason to aim them at the sky.


You're the apparent idiot, here. The plane was said to have been
flying low enough to go right through the main doors. And I guess
this means it should have been cought on tape.


Don't think so, unlike the conspiracy loons, I look at the facts, not their
distorted crap. That silly movie has been dissected by the experts, and
the opinion is that it is the usual conspiracy crap. The plane hit in the
middle of a wall, where there are no doors nearby, therefore no cameras.
And learn something before you spout nonsense. The security cameras at that
time were low resolution and used a low frame rate, they were designed to
spot a person or vehicle, not a plane travelling at hundreds of miles an
hour. If a camera had caught anything, it would have been an indistinct
blur in one or two frames only. Besides, the plane was caught on camera
from other locations. Also hundreds of eyewitnesses, some of them military
personnel who would know what they were looking at, saw the plane come in.


There are pictures of the immediate aftermath, which shows pieces of plane
scattered around everywhere, and many eyewitness accounts of people seeing
the plane fly into the building. How do you suggest the parts got there,
and how to you explain the eyewitnesses? Don't forget, you are talking
about a government who cannot manage to control a minor war, and you think
they are sophisticated enough to pull off something like what you are
suggesting?


Yeah, picking up bits of things that don't resemble anything the
size of a passenger craft. And what was that big blue thing they
carried out under secrecy? Oh yeah, where are all the dead bodies,
dip****?


I saw the tv footagge at the time it happened, I saw pieces I recognized as
airplane parts. Literally thousands of eyewitnesses were on the site within
minutes, they all say they were airplane parts. Get your info from reality,
not conspiracy loon websites, dip****.


todd wrote:
"Just Wondering" wrote in message
. ..
Luvrsmel wrote:
Building 7 contained records of Enron that would have implicated
Bush.
Besides, it wasn't entirely the US gov't behind it..it was the
Trilateral Commission...and they tell all Gov't what to do

All of whom are ultimately controlled by the Illuminati, who are
controlled by the Rothschilds.

How do people like luvrsmel function in society? Building 7 had Enron
records? Well, of course the answer is to blow it up.