View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to misc.kids,alt.music.monkees,rec.models.rockets,alt.home.repair,misc.survivalism
[email protected] trader4@optonline.net is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,500
Default Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

On Oct 17, 10:10 am, wrote:
Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
crashing down on the day of 9/11.

The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329

There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.

Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?

If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the
demolitions industry!

How do we know WTC 7 was demolished?

If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall
from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall.

This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did
so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED
DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT!

PROPOSITION 1:
It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the
ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
Collapse start time: 17 seconds
Collapse end time: 23 seconds
Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds

PROPOSITION 2:
A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6
seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean)
kinematical considerations alone:

Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration *
total time^2

or

s = ut + 1/2at^2
where
s = 174 m (height of building)
u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse)
a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at
a constant)

Thus,
174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2

Solving for t
t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8)
= 5.9590
~ 6 seconds



Proposition 3:
You're just another discredited 911 conspiracy kook. Why don't you
get together with the other clowns that claim WTC 1 and 2 couldn't
have been brought down by a raging jet fuel fire in just a couple
hours. Here, you have the thirdd building that burned for most of
the day before finally collapsing, and that isn't right either.

What are we supposed to believe? That the building was pre-rigged
with explosives? And those doing it knew just where the planes would
hit, exactly how WTC would be affected, and that the impact, debris,
fires, etc would not interfere with the explosives being set off 10
hours later? Or do you think guys went into the burning builiding at
the last minute to put explosives in place.

Can anyone be this stupid? And while getting together with your
fellow kooks, how about this. Tell us start to finish what happened
that day. That's what the 911 commission did and the story is
compelling. Make sure you include the kooks that claim it wasn't AA
jets that hit WTC, and kindly explain the missing AA planes, crew,
passengers, wreckage, etc that took of from airports that morning.