On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:57:56 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:05:20 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:00:21 -0700, IAmTheSlime
TheSlimeFromYourVideo@oozingacrossyourlivingroo mfloor.org wrote:

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:22:32 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
wrote:

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:06:46 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

so I wound up
fine-tweaking several factors iteratively until they gave the right
results.

Kind of like the warmingists do with their atmospheric "models"? ;-)


That's OK. I heard the dumb****s are thinking about giving Gore the
Peace Prize for his spew. Reminds me of the year they gave it to that
terrorist, nose picking ******* Arafat!

Don't forget Jimmy Carter, who bribed the Egyptians and Israelis to
make peace, when they were already at peace.

The Nobel committee has really degraded itself. The Emmy awards has
more integrity.

Bill Clinton was agressively lobbying for the Peace Prize; I bet he's
****ed that Al got it.


He even hired a PR group to assist.

Hey! You got one right!

I do that now and then, by sheer accident.

So, is Al going to run? He's already got a field operation trained
(ie, his slide-show presenters) and they are clamoring to draft him.
Maybe he'll run, "for the sake of humanity" or something heart-jerking
like that.

John