On 2007-10-15 21:59:25 +0100, Derek Geldard said:

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:13:07 +0100, Frank Erskine
wrote:

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:23:18 +0100, Andy Dingley
wrote:

However Consignia's management are,
by definition (implicit in the re-naming), clueless ****wits incapable
of carrying on the trade of whelk-based refreshment.

Consignia as a trading name hasn't existed for about five years!

Possibly,

But the fact is they did make the change, which was presumably
meaningful and significant for them.

And now they are *still* in the clag.

DG

It's a doomed operation, and the only question now left is how long
will that take.....

I had to smirk when I read the following on the BBC News web site about
the union membership ballot.

"Postal workers would vote on the deal's conditions by post"