DIYbanter - View Single Post - constructive critic on my plcc adapter PCB

JosephKK

John Larkin posted to
alt.binaries.schematics.electronic:

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:21:02 GMT, Rich Grise
wrote:

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:23:27 -0400, robb wrote:
"John Larkin" wrote
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:09:49 -0700, "Joel Kolstad"
"Joel Kolstad" wrote in
message
...
XEQ P (the parallel resistance program :-) )

^^^ BTW, while everyone knows that the parallel impedance
formula is 1/Result
= 1/Z1 + 1/Z2, for those of us who can get geeky with respect
to calculators
and numerical methods, using Result = (Z1*Z2)/(Z1+Z2) is more
accurate when Z1
is significantly larger or smaller than Z2... hence some of
the motivation to
write a program to do it each time.

When I have anything worth programming, I do it in PowerBasic.
It's
portable and archivable, and I can use double floats if needed.
PB
even has 80-bit floats!

if you need 80 bit floats ....
I am surprised you guys are not using some functional programming
language like scheme (lisp/Lambda calc variants) where your reals
are number abstractions with no language or data type imposed
limit on the number size or precision and of course no numerical
methods issues/errors from typical float/double data type
limitations
just wondering,

Loosely-typed or untyped data is a mare's nest of bugs just
waiting to happen.

There are no types in assembly. We don't need no stinkin' types!

John

Assembler on what machine? Most devices have various operand sizes
that it operates on. Or are you talking 8051? It has a default
operand size as well.