On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:32:18 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

Mark Rand wrote:

On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:38:57 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

Jon Danniken wrote:

"Ed Huntress" wrote:
"DoN. Nichols" wrote:
It is a pity that there is not a do-not-spam registry -- with
teeth.

Hear, hear.

Hard to prosecute the ones from China, et al.


You don't have to. The US should block all IP addresses assigned to
China, till they clean up their mess.

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Mark Rand
RTFM


You can't come up with an answer, so you post childish bull****.
Most of the spam that gets through comes from IP addresses assigned to
APNIC. By blocking them, it would all go away, till they cleaned up
their act. It wouldn't take very long. As soon as it started affecting
their exports they would start rounding up the worst offenders and
execute them.

http://www.apnic.net/


As others have indicated a lot of the spam (majority of what I receive) comes
from US ip addresses. Please feel free to execute the offenders. I am in the
process of changing my mail server from sendmail to exim. Then I will put the
Baysean filtering in rule list and reject spam instead of accepting it and
then deleting it.

Mark Rand
RTFM