In article ,
Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article ,
"HeyBub" wrote:

http://www.heraldtribune.com/article...NEWS/709210366

He is infringing on a trademark, let alone the convenants. The HOA is
within its rights on the first, maybe on the second.

I don't have a copy of the convenant, but according to the news article
the phrasing is "a ban on any commercial use of the property name" then
immediately following there's a statement that the guy is violating this
by "trying to see an idea". Frankly that's a rather long stretch.