"Doug Miller" wrote in message
t...
In article , cavelamb himself
wrote:

From what I saw in one of the demo videos, the flame - while very hot -
would not come anywhere near the 175 watts claimed for excitation power.

And that's the crux of the whole matter right there. It offers no
advantages,
beyond novelty, over conventional electrolysis (not "hydrolysis").

....whoops...

--
Ed Huntress