"Bob Mannix" wrote in message
...

"Doctor Drivel" wrote in message
reenews.net...

"Bob Mannix" wrote in message
...

Say it saves 2/3 of the electricity as resistance heating. That
brings it in line with current gas prices. What cost it is to buy is
then important. If it is a reasonable price to buy then it has
advantages of no servicing and small. It goes well with a thermal
store as the company web site shows. It will also kill heat pumps
stone dead, except where the heat pump is reversible for heat and
cool. Even then if using an absorption cooling system, it may be
viable. When gas supplies start to dwindle then this comes into its
own.

It is an over-unity device, if it does what they say, in that it
produces more in energy output that input. Using this surplus and go
through an energy state change may produce turning motion. Then
vehicle applications are then in the frame.


There is not, and never will be, an "over-unity" device that produces
more energy out than is consumed. The search for, and belief in, such
things are the desperate scrabblings of the feeble minded, poorly
educated or just plain gullible for an easy fix for our energy needs.

Have you told York University all this?

Au contraire, I find it a little suprising that a "discovery" that
disproves the laws of thermodynamics that correctly describe the
operation of energy throught the universe -

There is your problem. You believe that these laws cover all explanations
of matter/energy, etc. Any scientist who knows his stuff will tell you
that these laws are man made and explain about 10% of matter. The top
British scientist in that Swiss atom big circle pipe, only recently on TV
said that.

If you are referring to CERN, I think you may find he was referring to
"dark matter", which fills up the spaces between galaxies, and not water
heating!

He was speaking in general of our understanding of how matter, etc worked.

a discovery that would set all known science aside - fails to rate even
a mention on their website!

Could be a non-disclosure agreement.

This company did give money to York Uni for research, a Google brings
that out. York uni are highly rated as well.

Which is why they don't mention it, to preserve their reputation and
rating.

Then they give sound bites to the press.

Best to look at this as if the bottle if half full rather than half
empty. Have an open mind - say, nice idea now prove it to me. The man at
the uni who is involved is real too.

There is no bottle, you are admiring the emperor's new clothes.

You can't even see the emperor, at least I see him naked.