wrote in message
ps.com...

It seems a few unis do as well.

Universities don't "believe" in anything. A few individuals working
for a university have expressed interest - none have said they have
conclusive proof.

The mail report said:


"Jim Lyons, of the University of York, independently evaluated the system.
He said: 'Let's be honest, people are generally pretty sceptical about this
kind of thing. Our team was happy to take on the evaluation, even if to
prove it didn't work.

'But this is a very efficient replacement for the traditional immersion
heater. We have examined this interesting technology and when we got the rig
operating, we were getting 150 to 200 per cent more energy out than we put
in, without trying too hard.
People are sceptical - but somehow it works

'We are still not clear about the science involved here, because the physics
and chemistry are very different-to everything that has gone before. Our
challenge now is to study the science and how it works.' "


Note:
Jim Lyons, of the University of York, independently evaluated the system. He
said....

"We have examined this interesting technology and when we got the rig
operating, we were getting 150 to 200 per cent more energy out than we put
in, without trying too hard. "

If that is an exact quote, then that seems like it does what the inventors
claim.