Colin Wilson wrote:
Please tell us of one instance in which a gun was successfully
tried
for murder.

So if the gun itself isn't the nutter, the gun is owned BY the
nutter.

And then it's the "nutter", the ownership or possession of firearm by
which is unlawful everywhere in the United States, who commits the
murder.

Now, why it is that killing someone with underwear is OK with you but
not if a firearm is used?

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)