willshak wrote:
on 9/11/2007 11:34 PM Gunner said the following:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:29:43 GMT, raden wrote:


In message , Michael A. Terrell
writes

Gunner wrote:

On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:32:19 GMT, raden
wrote:


Short hair, no rings, no necklaces, no body metal, no ties, no
wris****ches and I have all my fingers left

Four beers for the carpenters .. as the germans say


Free men own guns

And dead people are the result

Dead bad people for the most part.

You seem to think this is a bad thing?

Gunner

He doesn't think, he just parrots the anti Second Amendment
cult.


We don't have a second amendment, you thick septic



Actully..you did have a Bill of Rights, which guarenteed weapons
ownership, until you used it for bumwad

Now you are simply a serf, owned by the State.

Doesnt that collar around your neck bother you?

Gunner


Why is it that some believe that the US Constitution guarantees
weapons ownership?
Most of these people have never read the law, and those that have
read
it, completely ignore the first clause of the sentence.
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free
state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be
infringed".
How many gun owners belong to a "well regulated militia"?

It seems that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit disagrees with your intepretation.

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)