willshak wrote:
on 9/12/2007 10:48 AM Sam E said the following:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:52:48 -0400, willshak

wrote:


on 9/11/2007 11:34 PM Gunner said the following:

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:29:43 GMT, raden wrote:



In message , Michael A. Terrell
writes


Gunner wrote:


On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:32:19 GMT, raden
wrote:



Short hair, no rings, no necklaces, no body metal, no ties,
no
wris****ches and I have all my fingers left


Four beers for the carpenters .. as the germans say



Free men own guns


And dead people are the result


Dead bad people for the most part.

You seem to think this is a bad thing?

Gunner


He doesn't think, he just parrots the anti Second Amendment
cult.



We don't have a second amendment, you thick septic


Actully..you did have a Bill of Rights, which guarenteed weapons
ownership, until you used it for bumwad

Now you are simply a serf, owned by the State.

Doesnt that collar around your neck bother you?

Gunner


Why is it that some believe that the US Constitution guarantees
weapons ownership?
Most of these people have never read the law, and those that have
read it, completely ignore the first clause of the sentence.
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a
free
state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be
infringed".
How many gun owners belong to a "well regulated militia"?


And where's the part of that which says a "well regulated militia"
is
the ONLY reason you can own a gun?


It is the section that gun proponents quote. If there is another
section that outlines gun ownership other than the 'militia, please
cite it.

If there is another section that defines "the people" as "members of a
well-regulated militia" then please cite it.

In any case, by law all males between the ages of 18 and 45 who are
citizens of the US are members of the militia.

I expect you don't know, and are just mindlessly repeating some
nonsense you heard somewhere (from someone who doesn't know
either).

I haven't insulted anyone over this issue. Why is it that you fell
the
need to do so?

His suggestion that you are parroting something that was told to you
is no more insulting than your suggestion that he had not read the
Amendment in it entirety.

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)