In article , dpb wrote:

Jim Yanik wrote:
dpb wrote in :



From a practical matter, it's unlikely the founders considered the
possibility of 300 million in population in the calculation of any
size growth and a consequent essentially unlimited growth in the size
of the House.

So,that's when you AMEND the Constitution,the PROPER way,not just pass laws
contrary to it.

It's not clear it is actually in contradiction...

--

Each House dude or dudette is current representing something like
650, 000 people (IIRC). The consitution sets it at 30,000 each. How can
that not be clear?