DIYbanter - View Single Post

krw

In article ,
says...

"krw" wrote in message
t...
In article ,
says...

"krw" wrote in message
t...
In article 9HKxi.441286$p47.374263@bgtnsc04-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net, says...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...
(snip)
I always tell people who think there's too many people to, "Be my
guest,
you go first!", but the hypocrites NEVER oblige.

And how many kids will you have during your lifetime?

And what the hell does that have to do with anything?

If you have to ask, explanations will likely be pointless. Look up
'carrying
capacity'.

(Standard disclaimer- I am not one of those wacko 'childfree' zealots.
I
like kids, and replacements have to come from somewhere. But now
that
most
of us do NOT live on farms and need to breed our own help, and now
that 1
kid in 3 or so DOESN'T die by age five, well, maybe 'replacements'
should
be
the term people keep in mind. 2.3 kids per breeding couple or so will
assure
population doesn't go down. Maybe a little higher to take into account
the
people like me that never succeeded in reproducing.

IIRC, a birth rate of 2.2/female is the replacement rate, which
includes "people like you" and deaths before childbearing age.

I am one kid out of 8,
with 7 surviving. Families that large make no economic or ecological
sense
any more. My sisters that did have kids had 2 each, so the genetic
line
will
go on.)

I'm one in four. Our average is 2 (my wife an I have one and one
brother with three).

And both of you miss the crucial points.

What, that you're an idiot, pretending to be human?

The idiot is the jerkoff you see in the mirror. You can buffalo your
braindead peers, but you're way out of your league.

Obviously I'm not in your league, fortunately.

Try learning how the real world works rather than sucking the
teachers/handlers dick.

Wow, you are an idiot, in a league of your own.

Are you even remotely familiar with world-wide demographics the past 50
years? Doubtful.

Clueless, at that.

Typical.

'Tis true, at least on the Usenet.

--
Keith
Learn some history (not the public skool variety), learn some economics (not
the Marxist variety), learn something about production, creativity and real
demographics.

Totally clueless.

In other words: Get a clue.

You first, comrade.

Or, I suppose you could just keep demonstrating your real ignorance.

Kepp going. I'm having fun with your cluelessness.

Or you could just respond like the typical children, mimicking what your
handlers want to hear and understanding nothing.

Still...

In fact, I expect more of yours and "aem" (who can't even abbreviate his
name) churlish drivel.

Speaking of which, have you actually read what you spew?

At least you don't make idiots of yourselves in a open form like Paul Erlich

You misspelled "Matt Barrow".

--
Keith