On Wed, 30 May 2007 20:31:26 -0700, JackShephard
wrote:

On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:58:27 +0100, feebo wrote:

There are plenty of places where it would be better located, especially
in light of some of the complaints some have registered about large image
sizes.

would that include 9000+ line attachments of your ****ty little proto,
or 4000+ attachments of your ****ty spreadsheet?

You're an idiot. It was a single file attachment, and gets posted into
a binary group no differently than any other file attachment, and the
same way all the other posters here post attachments, idiot.. You really
are stupid about Usenet, and you prove it every day you use it, kkkunt.

LOL!!!!! poor some sugar on me Dong!