MassiveProng wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:49:37 -0500, "Anthony Fremont"
Gave us:

MassiveProng wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:09:47 -0700, "Joel Kolstad"
Gave us:


In general I think you're 100% correct that there's been
significant pressure from the RIAA/MPAA/etc. applied to the
well-known manufacturers such as ATI, Happaugge, etc. to *not*
released non-DRM encumbered capture products.


Wrong. It was LAW and the standard from the get go.


Wrong, AFAIK the law never prohibited making HD capture cards with
analog inputs. Unless you could back up your claims.

****ing retards, all of you that don't know about modern Hi Def.

Making some more friends are you?

Read up, little boy. I know you hate wiki, but they know more than
you ever will.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI

I know what HDMI is idiot, I use it to connect my stuff. Where does it say
anything about the LAW requiring it? You'd do better to post a link to HDCP
instead of some stupid electrical interface description.