MassiveProng wrote:

On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:30:55 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
Gave us:

MassiveProng wrote:

On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 04:19:02 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
Gave us:

As promised, here is a photo taken in macro mode at four inches. It is
the bottom side of a IBM Deskstar DTLA-307030 hard drive.

Need to close the aperture to get more depth of field. That focus is
sad.

Lemmie guess... the primary lens on that camera is less than a half
inch in diameter!


Do your own research, idiot.

**** you, asswipe.

http://www.fujifilmusa.com/JSP/fuji/epartners/digitalS5200Overview.jsp

Hahaha Lame. In fact, it is a copy of my camera, but is worse on
the specs. It even uses the Olympus designed memory card.

http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_se...duct=1189&fl=4

A far better product, and is $100 minimum cheaper than they list it
at.

Mine: 1.4" Not bad for a fixed lens on a cheap camera.

I was wrong. It focuses even closer than that.

It is a 10 Optical zoom, with auto focus, moron.

Oh boy! It also allows YOU to make many setting, like APERTURE,
dip****.

Make sure you review the minimum focal length on it. You may have
been too close.


The minimum spec for macro shots is 4", and the camera was not on a
tripod.

3.9" actually.

It is a poor shot. There has to be some reason as I can compose
better shots than that crap handheld. Must be operator error, or you
were just too lazy to take a number of shots, and then pick the best
one from them.


You can't do ****, but run your mouth.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida