"Eeyore" wrote in message
...


"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
Eeyore wrote:

My point being however that there's currently no spare troops to
hand to do
so, no matter how well advised such a course of action might be (or not
even) in
the long term.

So, you expect us to believe that you are a world renowned expert
in
military strategy?

If that's what tickles your fancy !

It rather seems to me that it's simply a statement of fact actually.


Actually, you're as believable as Rosie O'Donnell and her conspiracy
theories about why the world trade center building collapse.

You have no concept of WHAT WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR THE MISSION

I know exactly what would be required and an important element is MORE
TROOPS ! Ours are
almost completely tied up with existing commitments.

If USAans are prepared to die for US for a change do let me know. Somehow
I suspect you
lot wouldn't be up for that.

Graham


From what I've seen, the Americans would like nothing better than a good
excuse to enter Iran with a very large tanker full of whoopass!