Is S.E.D actually sci.electronics.DUMMIES ??
"Eeyore" wrote in message
...
Genome wrote:
On the basis of the above analysis..... the gain is going to vary all
over
the shop as Bnpn (and other stuff) varies. So yes it is crap.
WRONG !
Every serious pro-audio mixer has a mic pre-amp circuit that's not a heck
of a
lot different to this since the late 1970s.
It performs really rather well. Has no-one yet considered simulating it ?
Graham
So, your counter to my 'analysis' is....
"WRONG
Every serious pro-audio.........."
Is that some sort of donkeymoron[1]?
How does the fact that someone uses something prove an analysis of it is
incorrect?
DNA
[1] cf oxymoron. Example 'serious pro-audio'
Good grief, the concept of 'pro-audio' is bad enough, getting serious about
it is just being silly.
|