flipper wrote:

On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:30:03 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:



"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:

me wrote:
"Bob Eld" wrote
"flipper" wrote
Jim Thompson wrote:

In a ruling today, with regard to gun-restrictive laws in DC, The
Court said that the 2nd Amendment guarantees the right for
INDIVIDUALS to bear arms ;-)

Read it and weep, liberal ****.

...Jim Thompson

Funny how everyone knew that for 200 years till the left magically
'discovered' that the founding fathers didn't know what they wrote.

That's bull ****, of course. The founding fathers were writing about
flint locks, match locks and other single shot muzzle loaders not simi
auto nine mm pistols or any other kind of modern weapon. Not that I
care, I have many guns but just to make a point. Now lets see this
CONservative court pay as much attention to the fourth amendment as
they just did to the second. Oh I forgot, cons don't like the first,
fourth and fifth, just the second!

Nonsense. They were writing about the (then) most modern, state of the
art firearms. The deadliest technology ever seen.

Yep. Furthermore, at about that time, the rifled musket was just
becoming available. So they surely were familiar with the concept that
what they were writing into law would have to apply to future and far
deadlier technologies.

Personal phasers ?

A stun setting would be a heck of an improvement, doncha think?


Graham


Who would notice the difference with the Donkey?


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida