"Jan Panteltje" wrote in message
...
On a sunny day (Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:43:58 -0700) it happened Spurious
Response
wrote in
:

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:52:20 GMT, Jan Panteltje
wrote:

On a sunny day (Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:44:31 +0100) it happened Eeyore
wrote in
:



Jan Panteltje wrote:

Chris Jones blind_mousewrote:

Well you just go and sit in your studio and watch your test cards
then.
What actually matters is the picture quality that people (don't) get
in
their homes.

Here is a screenshot of a testcard from satellite:
ftp://panteltje.com/pub/testcard-2.png
So what is wrong?
767x576 png, how you have a monitor with that resolution ;-)

Now this picture travelled 40000 km.

Have you considered a brain transplant ?

No, but come to think of it, yes, yours.

A stationary picture is no way to evaluate the quality of a compressed
signal.
It eliminites the most offensive aspect of compression, motion
artifacts.

Graham

Look mr rabbit, if I had made available a video clip, you would have
complained
you needed a real testcard, and I would be sued for copyright infrigment.


Frame captures, and small clips are part of what IS legal.

They are suing somebody for a youtube (or the like) clip, person had thier
toddler dancing to music from Prince playing on a TV in the background.

Hollywood has gone nuts, probably full of rabits too.


Even given the current copyright laws, I would think that any chance of
successfully prosecuting a ludicrously ridiculous case such as you cite, is
slim to zero ...

Arfa