On a sunny day (Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:04:35 +0100) it happened Eeyore
wrote in
:



Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:15:16 GMT) it happened Jan Panteltje
wrote in :

On a sunny day (Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:41:12 +0100) it happened Chris Jones
blind_mousewrote:

Well you just go and sit in your studio and watch your test cards then.
What actually matters is the picture quality that people (don't) get in
their homes.

Here is a screenshot of a testcard from satellite:
ftp://panteltje.com/pub/testcard-2.png
So what is wrong?
767x576 png, how you have a monitor with that resolution ;-)

Now this picture travelled 40000 km.

Actually there is something wrong in that testcard due to 16:10 aspect
translation, here is the one from a normal 4:3 screen:
ftp://panteltje.com/pub/testcard.png

This one is 1:1 pixel for pixel as it is received, the previous one
was rescaled to 767x576, this one is as it comes in here in 720x576 PAL.
Now that is a lot better!

There's still plenty of bleed betwen the colours.

Graham

Poor rabbit guy, do you not know UV in YUV is reduced resolution?
In PAL it is even half that vertically.
There

But yes, most rabits are grey, and have no color problem.
Mixomatose was their problem IIRC.

So what problem do you have with this one then:
ftp://panteltje.com/pub/00000300.ppm
?
You know this is part of a moving scene that you can see yourself on Sky HD
Promo, just one frame of it.

Oh you cannot see Sky HD, well you can see this.
Artefacts, WHAT artefacts?