On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:00:53 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Spurious Response wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

I shall never forget the idiotic shots thar showed a jet engine still running when
it clearly had no source of fuel.

You certainly do not know much about gyroscopic inertia.

You clearly are a cheap ****.

Jet engines with no source of fuel spool down *very* quickly.


There was obviously spurts of fuel as evidenced by the occasional
sputtering that caused it to surge UP in rpm every now and again.

Get a clue, dip****.

In reality, NO engine of that weight, particularly a turbo-fan, could
survive the impact from that altitude, or any altitude above fifty feet,
much less 5000. Nor could ANY of the passengers, etc., etc., etc.

You obviously do not know how to watch a fictional tale... at all.