"xModem" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:53:41 -0500, kjpro @ usenet.com wrote:


"xModem" wrote in message
.. .

Mere samplings of 36,000 people. That's significant.


So significant that it only included 12 brands... LMAO

Don't care. I'm only interested in the ones that *were* reported.
Nothing
more.


If you don't care, then why are you putting so much faith in their bull****
survey?


Longevity wasn't the purpose of the survey. The bottom rated may very
well
outlast the top rated. The survey concerned the number of problems
each
owner
had.


But how can one be at the bottom and outlast one on the top?
Wouldn't that make that brand better?

Not at all. Problems and longevity are two different beasts. I've had
more
than my share of problems with my unit, but it's 18 years old and still
going
strong. And NONE of them are related to the installation.

You're slipping... better get a grip!

Nice try, Mr Astaire.

Try?
It's all part of the overall picture that you want to overlook.
How many other items are you willing to overlook, that effect the *true*
FACTS?