Thread: [OT] Prius bashing
View Single Post
  #89   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
The Natural Philosopher The Natural Philosopher is offline
external usenet poster
  
Posts: 9,045
Default Prius bashing
wrote:
On Jul 4, 3:31 pm, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:
In article . com,
wrote:

I don't need to be an owner to defend something that is being
misrepresented.
But the main misrepresenting is in the hype and advertising.
That does not mean that the report is not skewed which is what my post
was about. The 'hype' is subjective anyway.
Perhaps you'd give details of how you think the article was skewed?

I was referring to the 'dust to dust' report. See my first post.
They didn't claim it meant much really.
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote