DIYbanter - View Single Post

The Natural Philosopher

wrote:
On Jul 4, 3:31 pm, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:
In article . com,
wrote:

I don't need to be an owner to defend something that is being
misrepresented.
But the main misrepresenting is in the hype and advertising.
That does not mean that the report is not skewed which is what my post
was about. The 'hype' is subjective anyway.
Perhaps you'd give details of how you think the article was skewed?

I was referring to the 'dust to dust' report. See my first post.
They didn't claim it meant much really.