John Rumm wrote:

I've also created an 'Under Construction' template (imaginatively titled
'Under-construction' :-)) which I've applied to this article.

What do people think of this?

Seems ok, although I expect the template alone is probably enough... if
you arrive at an article and the first thing you see is a message saying
it is not done, then you can't expect too much from it regardless of its
name.


It's a WIKI. Every page is *always* going to be under construction. There is no
point stating the bleeding obvious ;-)

-- JJ