Offbreed wrote in message ...

You say "normal right wing line", how much of the population do YOU
consider right or left wing?

Living in a town that's so far right wing that they pray to raygun, I
have no real idea.

Notice that more of the bigger donations go to the Democrats. That's
not money coming from blue collars.

Donations prove nothing, and your reasoning fails to consider that
most blue collars are not in a position to donate money to anyone,
thanks to raygun, bush the first and bush the stupid. CHeck the
downturns of the economy, always during a rightwing administration,
always only broken when a democrat takes the white house. People
losing homes, jobs, careers, is not good for the people, but the right
wing sure hates a low unemployment figure.


I think he is doing wrong things, but what I think he is doing wrong
is not what the "liberals" say he is doing wrong. As a result, I often
appear to be a supporter of his.


It doesn't bother you that the GWeeB has taken a huge budget surplus
and turned it into a debt that will take many generations to pay off?

Did I address that? Might this be one of the things I do not regard as
slanted criticism?

No, but it points out that you're awful good at ignoring things that
are important, and clinging to things that are not important.

the president should never be
off the hotseat, doesn't matter which party he belongs to.

This is the only part I agree fully with. The press goes easy on
Democrats, though.

You're in a different world than I am, around here, mostly bush can't
do anything wrong if one believes the press. Neither could his
secretary of hew, toxic tommy, that has no business in that office,
dog catcher would be more appropriate, but only where there are no
dogs. He couldn't tell them from kids.


As opposed to Clinton and Gore? Did you criticise either when they got
caught in their lies?

If your did not, you are biased.

I did not criticize him, but that doesn't mean I agreed with him
either. His game of stinky pinky cost me nothing, bush is going to
cost a lot of people something really important, their freedom. and I
mean the whole country, unless that asshole can be dumped in the
garbage a quickly as possible. There was once a time when not
discussing a personal affair was considered honorable, the "sign of a
gentleman". Sure rules the right wing out. The Clinton affair is
pretty well over, it's ****ing dead, except to those few that feel it
shows their "superior" intelect, morals, whatever you want to call
their fat ego. Bush met his drug laden past with "I won't discuss
that". Brilliant. the sign of the guilty. his suckout buddy rush
the druggy proves it.