"Julian" wrote in message
...

"Clive George" wrote in message
...
"Julian" wrote in message
...

Your "2 cistern" proposal would break the law by deliberately
contriving to cause
the meter to read incorrectly:

Now that I am aware that I (aided and abetted by a friend's horse) have
pinched water IAW the following:

(2) No water fitting shall be installed, connected, arranged or used
in such a manner that it causes or is likely to cause-

(i) waste, misuse, undue consumption or contamination of water
supplied by a water undertaker; or

(ii) the erroneous measurement of water supplied by a water
undertaker.

I wonder what you suggest I should do. We actually have about 5 troughs
on the property and they all are only likely to ever fill at a slow rate
due to horse's drinking habits. If you wish to draft a letter of enquiry
for me I'll gladly forward it to United Ut's.

The difference is you can't demonstrate intent with what you've got at
the moment - mostly because there wasn't any. If you have a 2-cistern
solution for no apparent reason other than to ensure you get water as
slow as possible, that shows intent.

That would be a difference, but in this instance I'm fully aware that I am
drawing water from UU's system without paying for it and that must change
things. Ie No water fitting shall be installed, (I have several) &
cause the erroneous measurement of water supplied by a water
undertaker.(which I have proven to take place) So, my question remains -
what action do I now need to take? Maybe some of the characters who think
I'm a thief could put their thinking caps on!

Julian


Take no action;
Your _confession_ has been noted by Echelon!
Soon -well for some definition of soon- a report will be forwarded to DEFRA
and the Rural Payments Agency will be visiting! {after George Brown has
re-shuffled _his_ Cabinet.)

--

Brian