View Single Post
  #40   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
dennis@home dennis@home is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,369
Default Totally OT - Highway Question - Is 100 Metres Enough


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
...
On 2007-05-08 19:06:59 +0100, "dennis@home"
said:


So assuming there are warning signs for a blind entrance/exit is it now
the
fault of the driver on the main road for driving too fast?


If he isn't exceeding the speed limit and there are no other signs or
visual clues then no.


So its OK to ignore warning signs then.


Why should he need warning signs? Is he driving too fast for the
conditions?


There can be blind entrances and turnings with no visual clues at all. If
these represent a hazard, then they should be appropriately signed,
keeping in mind that if there are too many, people will have information
overload and not notice them as much.


Are the warning lines in the midle of the road adequate rather than
clutering the place with more signs?
(Hands up those of you that don't know what I am talking about.)