JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Rudy Canoza" wrote in message
link.net...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Rudy Canoza" wrote in message
news JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Rudy Canoza" wrote in message
thlink.net...

There *is* something physically wrong with him
You have no evidence to support that claim, nor any expertise to
evaluate any evidence if you somehow acquired it.
I was going to say "something physically or psychologically wrong", but
most doctors no longer make that distinction. Take your pick.
You still have no expertise.


I am aware of media speculation about Bush's speech and its potential
significance as a symptom of some kind of neurological defect. I
never heard or read anything definitive about it, and the experts
quoted in stories didn't reach a consensus. You were not one of those
experts.
If you find nothing wrong with his speech patterns, or his inability to
assemble thoughts coherently without a script,
I find him highly inarticulate.


I hope someone other than you is responsible for supervising your
children's education. You are blind. I expect the president to be a
clear and intelligent spokesperson for our country. Bush is not.
Many presidents have not been good public speakers. I don't believe
lack of speaking ability necessarily indicates inability to be an
effective and good president, just as polished speaking delivery doesn't
indicate that a president *is* effective and good.

Whatever you say, Rudy.

Meanwhile, our primary enemy is growing stronger, and our soldiers are in
the country country to do much about it. And, your president
Yours, too.

Take full responsibility for your treasonous act.

What treasonous act? You really are falling over the
cliff of irrationality now.


You hired the asshole.

I didn't vote for him.


He's all yours.

George W. Bush is, of course, your president, unless
you want to tell us you're not a U.S. citizen or U.S.
national.


All I ever want from him is five minutes alone in a room.
His boys can search me for weapons first.

Something is really wrong with you.


is selling F-16s to the country which harbors our primary enemy.
Why do you suppose that is?

I've heard all the excuses. Which one do YOU worship?

I don't know what you're talking about.



Hint: There isn't one single example of a country like ours getting a
straight deal from any country in the Middle East that we've called an ally.
And, don't say "Israel".

I won't.

I still want to know why you think it is we're selling
F-16 planes to the country which [sic] harbors our
primary enemy.

Why do you like to be so vague? Do you think it's
amusing or witty?