JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Rudy Canoza" wrote in message
nk.net...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Rudy Canoza" wrote in message
nk.net...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Rudy Canoza" wrote in message
ink.net...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Dave Bugg" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
Meanwhile, YOUR PRESIDENT can't put his foot down and arrange for
our
soldiers to have the protective gear they need. They have to get it
from a CHARITY. Otherwise, they are at high risk of coming home
with
brain injuries that are more prevalent in this war than any other.
It isn't as simple as you make it sound, Joe. Military equipment is
always undergoing testing and modification, even during wartime.
There are three helmet systems in use, and they are being
retro-fitted with the new padding system. Even without the new
padding system, the helmets are incredibly effective. I know from
experience. With the new padding system, it's even better solving
some of the issues with blast concussion.

Operation Helmet began providing new liners before official testing
and adoptation was completed by the military. And they have helped
in getting them out faster than thru normal military channels. This
has nothing to do with Bush.
It has everything to do with Bush. The title "commander in chief"
means he is, in effect, the CEO of a very large corporation called
America.
False; that's just a wretchedly ****ty analogy. America is not a
corporation, and the president doesn't run "America"; he is the head
of the federal government. Government is a big part of America, but
it is not the country, and the federal government is not the only
governmental entity in the country.

Even limiting the analysis to the federal government, which is not all
of government, which in turn is not all of the country, the president
is *not* like a CEO of a corporation. There is no separation of
powers in a corporation: no courts, no legislature. You exhibit
massive and *willful* ignorance of the Constitution by failing to note
that the entire Article I of the Constitution, 10 sections in all,
spell out the powers and responsibilities of the *legislative* branch.

You are a benighted polemicist, and stupid beyond words.
I'm not saying the president is responsible for funding projects.
You slopped together a ****ty analogy; that's all. You're blinded by
partisanship, so I'm not surprised you can't see facts as they are.

Not partisanship.
Yes, it's partisanship. You've said enough, and in revealing language,
that your partisanship is clear.

Just to be sure you and I share the same definition of "partisanship", are
you saying my comments are the result of disliking a certain political
party, or just one particular person?

You express a cohesive set of political beliefs that
place you firmly to one side of the center.