View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
Santa Cruz Mike
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT - In Defense of Religious Marriage

On 3 Mar 2004 14:50:11 -0800, (Cliff Huprich) wrote:

Here is a proposed Constitutional
Amendment codifying marriage entirely on biblical
principles:

A. Marriage in the United States shall consist of a
union between one man and one or more women. (Gen
29:17-28; II Sam 3:2-5)

B. Marriage shall not impede a man's right to take
concubines in addition to his wife or wives. (II Sam
5:13; I Kings 11:3; II Chron 11:21)

C. A marriage shall be considered valid only if the
wife is a virgin. If the wife is not a virgin, she
shall be executed. (Deut 22:13-21)

D. Marriage of a believer and a non-believer shall be
forbidden. (Gen 24:3; Num 25:1-9; Ezra 9:12; Neh
10:30)

E. Since marriage is for life, neither this
Constitution nor the constitution of any State, nor
any state or federal law, shall be construed to permit
divorce. (Deut 22:19; Mark 10:9)

F. If a married man dies without children, his brother
shall marry the widow. If he refuses to marry his
brother's widow or deliberately does not give her
children, he shall pay a fine of one shoe and be
otherwise punished in a manner to be determined by
law. (Gen. 38:6-10; Deut 25:5-10)

Think about it! Does this sound like the America that you want to live in?
Do you think that codifying marriage entirely on biblical principles is a
good idea?



Cliff... have you been reading those old Jewish books?

I was hoping you woudl come around..

Don't you have some unfinished business?

Cliff's Research Project:
Prove that God does not exist.
Which version of SmartCAm did you use to know so much about it's
abilities?
What Smartcam template files have you created or edited to understand
the code generation possibilities of Smart Cam?
What CAD/CAM system do you use on a daily, or weekly, ok monthly basis
to program with?
What is AIDS?
Why is considered an AIDS death?
What causes AIDS?