DIYbanter - View Single Post

Tim Daneliuk

wrote:
SNIP

Yourself, Mr Daneliuk, and Mark or Juanita seem to be
confusing the media's reliance on consensus within the
scientific community with a supposed, and never demonstrated
reliance upon consensus within the field of climatology itself.

And you are (quite dishonestly) arguing as if there is essentially
no material disagreement within the climatology community. You
cannot bring yourself to speak the truth: The current state of
climatology does NOT justify the claimed level of confidence of
cause/effect/end result associated with global warming. This is
not to say it never will - it might, it might not. But the incredible
levels of confidence about what causes gw, how severe it is, and what
its outcomes will be simply cannot be *demonstrated by the data at hand*,
at least not to the point of being inarguable.

This breathtaking confidence in the absence of proof is a *political*
behavior whenever it occurs, whether by trained climatologists or
trained chimps like Gore...