On Mar 6, 12:31 pm, MassiveProng
wrote:
On 5 Mar 2007 03:15:57 -0800, "David L. Jones"
Gave us:



On Mar 5, 9:48 pm, MassiveProng
wrote:
On 5 Mar 2007 01:46:21 -0800, "David L. Jones"
Gave us:

I don't think it's any use, after all MassiveProng didn't know that
modern scopes still only have a few percent vertical accuracy,

Said the total retard that then proceeded to tell us all about his 2%
scope.

2% ain't too bad in the scope world, didn't you know? - oh that's
right, you didn't know!
LMAO!

Now your retarded ass is trying to tell me what I do or do not know
about the gear I use every day?

Yup, you obviously didn't know that scope vertical channels were only
a few percent accurate.
You certainly did make a very spectacular fool of yourself!

We are all still anxiously awaiting your link to a scope that does
better than a percent or two on the vertical...

There are plenty that have accurate voltmeters included that give
precise readouts of measure signals, regardless of what the user
observes via the actual trace signature. D'oh!

LMAO!
Try harder.

Dave