MassiveProng wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 20:44:19 -0600, "Anthony Fremont"
Gave us:

MassiveProng wrote:
On 2 Mar 2007 15:09:30 -0800, "David L. Jones"
Gave us:

Which is why you do it for each range and then spot check it to see
that there is no funny business. Perfectly valid technique for home
calibration of a scope vertical scale.

Dave

It doesn't matter how many "places" you "spot check" it, you are
not going to get the accuracy of your comparison standard on the
device you intend to set with it. What you do is take the basic
INaccuracy of the device needing to be set, and add to it the basic
INaccuracy of the standard to which you are setting it. You CANNOT
get any closer than that. So, a 0.5% meter, and a 0.5% scope cannot
be used together to make the scope that accurate. You need a
*finer* standard than the accuracy level you wish to achieve.

You need to understand that as a basic fact, chucko.

The "basic fact" here is that we were talking about adjusting a 3%
scope with a .03% meter.
]
Nope. READ HIS replies. He was talking about using a 3% meter.

I believe we were talking about scopes only being about 3% accurate in the
vertical. You are the one that pulled that garbage out of the air about
leaving the scope 6% off. You should try reading what people write instead
of what you wish they wrote.

Now that the number are back where they belong, please
procede to restate your case.

**** you. Read HIS criteria, dip****, don't impose yours. Remeber,
it was ME that stated that the cal device had to be ten times more
accurate than the target to be cal'd. So **** off.

Are you really that incompetent? I AM THE ONE that stated that I could use
..03% meter to adjust it. It was in my very first post in this thread. Now
stop lying.


The scope's vertical sensitivity could easily
be adjusted to within 3% using said meter, now can't it? Just like
Keith says......

That is NOT what the retarded ******* said, you retarded *******.