You want to attack my adulthood, fine, little boy. You are
BRAINLESS for this task.

I wasn't attacking your adulthood MiniPrick....an adult would not
behave in the manner you are.

Now a child....yes a child could easily be acting this way....so from
now on we will call you MiniPrick.



I have worked in cal labs and in QA for years. You lose, sonny.


Laugh....laugh....laugh....emptying trash cans is NOT working in cal
labs and QA.

Hey MiniPrick....you done with the homework assignment yet?

TMT





On Mar 1, 6:23 am, MassiveProng
wrote:
On 28 Feb 2007 21:50:49 -0800, "Too_Many_Tools"
Gave us:



Thanks for the (positive) comments so far.

I look forward to any more you might want to offer.

Any circuits or examples others have done?

Any cal boxes that anyone have built?

TMT

All the circuits suggested here, while appearing good on the surface,
are all likely to introduce more error into your instruments than
correct.

THAT IS WHY REAL calibration services are used, and why I suggested
that if you do not intend to have it professionally calibrated, you...
YOU IN PARTICULAR, should just leave the gear alone, as you are too
****ing stupid to do it without introducing the aforementioned error.

In other words, they are better off UNcalibrated and still reliable,
than after any futzing around a twit like you will do with them. You
LACK the competence.

You want to attack my adulthood, fine, little boy. You are
BRAINLESS for this task.

I have worked in cal labs and in QA for years. You lose, sonny.





You want to attack my adulthood, fine, little boy. You are
BRAINLESS for this task.

I have worked in cal labs and in QA for years. You lose, sonny.