Mark & Juanita writes:
On 27 Feb 2007 15:42:13 -0600, D Smith wrote:
Mike Hartigan writes:
In article ,
says...
[...] Kyoto only calls for reductions, not elimination.
Kyoto is what turned this into a blatantly political issue. Kyoto
calls for neither a reduction nor an elimination of global CO2
emissions. It simply prescribes a redistribution of these emissions.
It virtually guarantees that manufacturing would shift largely from
the US to so-called 'developing countries' (China, India, et al) -
countries that are on track to surpass the US in oil consumption
during the next decade, even without Kyoto. It's just one more
incentive to outsource.
...and that is the incentive to get Kyoto done, make every effort to
meet the targets, and then at the next stage of negotiations get more
countries involved, eventually getting ALL countries on side. The
exclusion of developing countries from targets should be considered
temporary, and that was the plan with Kyoto.
You really don't understand how global politics works, do you?
Um, let me see. Negotiate international treaties. Go back on your
word. When someone doesn't like you, ask UN to sanction them. When UN
doesn't, (or doesn't do it fast enough), send in the Marines and overthrow
foreign governments. When questioned, say "He started it!!" and let UN
know you'll use your veto if they try to do anything to you. Look puzzled
when other countries say they are unhappy with your behaviour, and say "we
want to bring them democracy! ...whether they want it or not!" Act as if
voting in other countries isn't "democratic" because you don't like the
people that got elected.
...and above all else, NEVER let them see that you're scared.
Howzatt?