In message , John
Rumm writes
raden wrote:

It's not difficult for Potterton to argue that the pcb is not
compliant with their boiler, even if it performs the primary functions

Although each time they make that argument they will presumably have to
give away another secondary function. ;-)

Presumably, eventually

It could be that Potterton will now be backed into a corner where they
will have to retrofit boilers after the watchdog progs ... which will
mean that it's possibly not such an attractive proposition as it might
have previously looked.

They have survived on a "divide and conquer" basis. Watchdog might have
finally broken this down


--
geoff